According to rule 10.17 of the MLB rulebook, a Win will go to a starting pitcher whose team assumes a lead while such pitcher is in the game or during the inning on offense in which such pitcher is removed from the game and his team does not relinquish that lead. Such pitcher must complete either five innings of a game that lasts six or more innings on defense or four innings of a game that lasts five innings on defense.
So there you go. That’s a win. All those words up there. Who talks like that?
You know I can’t help but think that if they weren’t called Wins and Losses, the people who still use them would have moved on from them a long time ago right along with the rest of us. Instead, we hear people say things like, “the object of the game is to win, so give me a pitcher with the most wins over a pitcher with the highest C.L.A.P. any day,” or some shit like that. Which of course is silly because based on the definition I pasted up top, they’re a completely arbitrary set of rules that really have nothing to do with whether or not a pitcher’s team won or lost. If a Win was called by any other name, nobody would mention them. But since they were given a name that people associate with a team’s overall success, they’re still treated with high regard even though the rules given to a pitcher’s wins and losses do not equate evenly to a team’s wins and losses.
I don’t think we’ll ever convince the higher-ups to get rid of them completely because they’ve been counted for over a hundred years now. Plus the 300 benchmark for Wins is still pretty cool. So here’s what I propose: we change their names. And since I’m the person mentioning it, we’re naming it after me. From now on, a Win will be called a Happy and a Loss will be called a Sad.
Hey did you see that Jake Peavy is on his way to 20 Happys?
This could work*. Read the rest of this entry »

/Rant
Sunday morning, I received a text from a good friend of mine that said “Gaines Adams dead?” It even came with a question mark, which I found to be an odd choice of punctuation for a text like that. But I digress, whatever that means. I got the text at the exact same moment that Adam Schefter was appearing on my television screen to deliver the news; Gaines Adams was dead at age 26. It’s a sad thing, ya know? All indications are that he died from a previously undiagnosed enlarged heart, which really sucks. But this post isn’t going to be a sappy tribute to a man we hardly knew. I know when someone dies suddenly, it’s traditional for people to say how sad they are and how this “puts things in perspective”. But that’s all a lie. Nobody gives a shit. If they did, we wouldn’t need to put things in perspective. We’d be nice human beings all the time rather than only being nice when it’s convenient and expected. So instead of all that, I’m going to give you my real immediate thoughts upon hearing the news, unabashed and unfiltered, tact be damned. Some of these thoughts are me trying to be funny in the face of tragedy (and failing more times than not), while some of them are probably moreso an expression of frustration that I continue to follow a team in the Chicago Bears that can’t seem to catch a break. So here they are, my immediate thoughts after hearing that Gaines Adams died of an enlarged heart:
If you are part of a household that goes through milk pretty quickly, it should be your civic duty to buy the gallon with the closest expiration date to the current date while saving the newer gallons for us folks who take longer.
We recently had a staff meeting* in which it was made clear that Major League Jerk and any entity within MLJ, Inc. would not be taking a formal stance or opinion on the whole Josh Hamilton situation 


