hyperbole is a bitch.

spencer096: did i say that? when? you got a link? if so, i’ll delightfully recant because he’s still better than at least half the QB’s in the league, but he’s nothing special.

Yep Spence you said it, last paragraph of your post…”this is a guy that 31 other teams in the NFL would look at and say, “no fucking thanks,”..

Sorry for the late post, but been away since Friday and just checked in before Monday.

but big ben fails that too.

Now there is something we can agree on.
Here’s another: Steeler fans can suck it.

Ryan has a lot tougher schedule this year than last year so if he puts together a good year I’ll come around.

Hicktown: Well Spence this was in response to your comment about every other organization in the NFL not wanting Rothelisberger

did i say that? when? you got a link? if so, i’ll delightfully recant because he’s still better than at least half the QB’s in the league, but he’s nothing special.

spencer096: wow…AWESOME comment, farva.please, if anyone knows what bad QB play looks like it’s browns fans. and fortunately for you, i can apply my expertise to every other team in the league.go lick roethlisberger’s fleshy fun bridge steelers fan.

Well Spence this was in response to your comment about every other organization in the NFL not wanting Rothelisberger. He’s not the best, but he is better than most other starting QB’s out there. If the Browns would say no to him then a river would catch fire. Oops, thats already happened in Cleveland, my bad.

i agree that the eyeball test is the best way to go about it, but big ben fails that too. matt ryan passes considering the amount of responsibility that was on his shoulders while flacco was a a down’s syndrome trent dilfer handing off and letting the D score points.

and i like comparing poops…i have a scat thing going on.

i disrespectfully disagree…what you like taking things at face value? do you buy a car without seeing how many miles it has on it just because the paint looks good?

those stats are CRUCIAL for evaluating a QB’s performance. is derek anderson worse than jake delhomme?

I’m not taking the stats at face value. I looked at their perfomances, saw that they both sucked a fatty (dick not blunt) againt good defenses and came to the conclusion that they are at the same level – average ass qbs. Both got their “props” throughout the year because their teams were winning, not because they were shredding respectable defenses.

“Quarterbacks are ranked according to DYAR, or Defense-adjusted Yards Above Replacement. This gives the value of the quarterback’s performance compared to replacement level, adjusted for situation and opponent and then translated into yardage”

Those are all un-controlled variables, which makes coming up with a dependable formula impossible. Taking this DYAR at face value is no different than taking “regular” stats at face value.

Oh and yes, Derek Anderson is certainly worse than Jake Dehlomme. But why compare a poop to a turd anyway?

Hef:
Has anyone ever considered either of these two QBs good?I don’t get it.

asking a steelers fan to look at things using logic and reasoning is like asking the sun to rise in the west…not happening.

Hicktown: Lets see, Brady Quinn and his homoerotic ways, Derek Anderson and his inability to complete a pass, or Ben Rothelisberger?No wander Browns fans are dumbfucks rooting for a shitstained team.

Has anyone ever considered either of these two QBs good? I don’t get it.