Comments on: Should the Reds Trade Homer Bailey for Jermaine Dye?

By: Definitely not Hef

Definitely not Hef — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:03:18 +0000

No he doesn’t, Tampa. Hef’s awesome

By: Tampa Bo

Tampa Bo — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:54:09 +0000

Im bookmarking this because hef sucks baby dicks.

By: NickP

NickP — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:51:46 +0000

So what if Dye had a salary of $100000 million? He’d still be better than Homer?

Where’s the line, Glenn Ritchie?

(If that’s your real name)

By: Glenn Ritchie

Glenn Ritchie — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:47:23 +0000

If the White Sox are dumb enough to accept that worthless head-trip loser for a proven RH hitter with the ability to catch a ball, I would think Walt and Bob should be dancing for joy.

By: Hef

Hef — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:44:23 +0000

And I just bookmarked this because Tampa was wrong. I like remembering all the wrong things people say.

By: Tampa Bo

Tampa Bo — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:42:02 +0000

This is not going to happen.

By: NickP

NickP — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:53:48 +0000

He’s not a bad player, Happy. Just overpaid.

I agree people are stupid.

By: 1 Happy St

1 Happy St — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:05:35 +0000

Nick, did you know that around here in Chicago, there are White Sox fans who would be pissed if Kenny Williams traded Jermaine Dye or Bobby Jenks?

What’s the lesson? I’m not sure.

Oh wait yes I am. People are stupid.

I fully endorse a Jermaine Dye for Homer Bailey trade.

By: fetch

fetch — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:10:25 +0000

I’m not saying trade Homer for Dye, I’m saying take him to the Ohio River and drown him.

By: NickP

NickP — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:03:21 +0000

Even if you think Homer can’t start because he only has 2 pitches, he’d provide more equity as a potential relief ace than Dye ever could (Dye will provide negative equity).